• 董卿白岩松朱广权 看看央视主持人大学就读啥院系 2019-07-19
  • 紫光阁中共中央国家机关工作委员会 2019-07-17
  • 中阿合作论坛第八届部长级会议将在京举行 2019-07-17
  • 端午节小长假 南昌两站共发送旅客59万人 2019-07-15
  • 泗县:发挥乡贤独特治理模式 2019-07-02
  • 福建泉港:“海上党课”宣讲十九大精神 发展海上渔业渔民信心倍增 2019-06-30
  • 时评丨让生态保护 从“禁令”走向“自觉” 2019-06-30
  • 新华社媒体大脑两会上岗 15秒生产首条两会视频新闻 2019-06-23
  • 江西省“放管服”改革再出实招 2019-06-21
  • 鲜琦:感恩父亲节,永远难忘父亲这首歌(3) 2019-06-21
  • 陕西咸阳市彬县(塌陷)发生3.2级地震  2019-06-21
  • 热波十年,用潮流音乐迎接95、00后热波 音乐节 2019-06-18
  • 人民日报评论员:高扬凝心聚力的中国精神 2019-06-18
  • 苹果市值9370亿美元 在标普500成分股中占比为4% 2019-06-17
  • 习近平主持上海合作组织青岛峰会小范围会谈 2019-06-17
  • 泳坛夺金基本走势图:2020年考研英语阅读模拟试题及答案(五)

    考研考试网 鲤鱼小编 更新时间:2019-04-24

    When you think of the tremendous technological progress we have made, its amazing how little we have developed in other respects. We may speak contemptuously of the poor old Romans because they relished the orgies of slaughter that went on in their arenas. We may despise them because they mistook these goings on for entertainment. We may forgive them condescendingly because they lived 2000 years ago and obviously knew no better. But are our feelings of superiority really justified? Are we any less blood-thirsty? Why do boxing matches, for instance, attract such universal interest? Dont the spectators who attend them hope they will see some violence? Human beings remains as bloodthirsty as ever they were. The only difference between ourselves and the Romans is that while they were honest enough to admit that they enjoyed watching hungey lions tearing people apart and eating them alive, we find all sorts of sophisticated arguments to defend sports which should have been banned long age; sports which are quite as barbarous as, say, public hangings or bearbaiting.

      It really is incredible that in this day and age we should still allow hunting or bull-fighting, that we should be prepared to sit back and watch two men batter each other to pulp in a boxing ring, that we should be relatively unmoved by the sight of one or a number of racing cars crashing and bursting into flames. Let us not deceive ourselves. Any talk of the sporting spiritis sheer hypocrisy. People take part in violent sports because of the high rewards they bring. Spectators are willing to pay vast sums of money to see violence. A world heavyweight championship match, for instance, is front page news. Millions of people are disappointed if a big fight is over in two rounds instead of fifteen. They feel disappointment because they have been deprived of the exquisite pleasure of witnessing prolonged torture and violence.

      Why should we ban violent sports if people enjoy them so much? You may well ask. The answer is simple: they are uncivilized. For centuries man has been trying to improve himself spiritually and emotionally - admittedly with little success. But at least we no longer tolerate the sight madmen cooped up in cages, or public floggings of any of the countless other barbaric practices which were common in the past. Prisons are no longer the grim forbidding places they used to be. Social welfare systems are in operation in many parts of the world. Big efforts are being made to distribute wealth fairly. These changes have come about not because human beings have suddenly and unaccountably improved, but because positive steps were taken to change the law. The law is the biggest instrument of social change that we have and it may exert great civilizing influence. If we banned dangerous and violent sports, we would be moving one step further to improving mankind. We would recognize that violence is degrading and unworthy of human beings.

      21. It can be inferred from the passage that the authors opinion of nowadayshuman beings is

      A. not very high. B. high.

      C. contemptuous. D. critical.

      22. The main idea of this passage is

      A. vicious and dangerous sports should be banned by law.

      B. people are willing to pay vast sums money to see violence.

      C. to compare two different attitudes towards dangerous sports.

      D. people are bloodthirsty in sports.

      23. That the author mentions the old Romans is

      A. To compare the old Romans with todays people.

      B. to give an example.

      C. to show human beings in the past know nothing better.

      D. to indicate human beings are used to bloodthirsty.

      24. How many dangerous sports does the author mention in this passage?

      A. Three. B. Five.

      C. Six. D. Seven.

      25. The purpose of the author in writing this passage is

      A. that, by banning the violent sports, we human beings can improve our selves.

      B. that, by banning the dangerous sports, we can improve the law.

      C. that we must take positive steps to improve social welfare system.

      D. to show law is the main instrument of social change.

      参考答案:A A D B A

    以上就是2020年考研英语阅读模拟试题及答案,希望能给大家带来帮助,想了解更多关于考研的考试资讯,请持续关注鲤鱼网,小编会在第一时间更新考试信息和复习资料,供大家参考。

    相关推荐:

    2019考研调剂信息发布:赣南医学院

    2020年考研的三大变化如下

  • 董卿白岩松朱广权 看看央视主持人大学就读啥院系 2019-07-19
  • 紫光阁中共中央国家机关工作委员会 2019-07-17
  • 中阿合作论坛第八届部长级会议将在京举行 2019-07-17
  • 端午节小长假 南昌两站共发送旅客59万人 2019-07-15
  • 泗县:发挥乡贤独特治理模式 2019-07-02
  • 福建泉港:“海上党课”宣讲十九大精神 发展海上渔业渔民信心倍增 2019-06-30
  • 时评丨让生态保护 从“禁令”走向“自觉” 2019-06-30
  • 新华社媒体大脑两会上岗 15秒生产首条两会视频新闻 2019-06-23
  • 江西省“放管服”改革再出实招 2019-06-21
  • 鲜琦:感恩父亲节,永远难忘父亲这首歌(3) 2019-06-21
  • 陕西咸阳市彬县(塌陷)发生3.2级地震  2019-06-21
  • 热波十年,用潮流音乐迎接95、00后热波 音乐节 2019-06-18
  • 人民日报评论员:高扬凝心聚力的中国精神 2019-06-18
  • 苹果市值9370亿美元 在标普500成分股中占比为4% 2019-06-17
  • 习近平主持上海合作组织青岛峰会小范围会谈 2019-06-17
  • 安徽十一选五开奖记录 西甲马竞皇马 凯斯线上娱乐城博彩注册 新疆25选7怎么算中奖钱 4399炸金花网页游戏 四川快乐12最长遗漏 二肖中特精准资料下载 25选5大星走势图 竟彩14场胜负开奖结果 吉林快3专家预测助手 12057七星彩走势图 沈阳盛京真钱棋牌社 36体育彩票走势图 双色球蓝球杀号百度彩票 竞彩足球任选9场